Wednesday, September 15, 2010

New and yet Familiar: A review of Trickster



TRICKSTER
Native American Tales – a Graphic Collection
Edited and Illustrated in part by Matt Dembicki
Reviewed by Ernest M. Whiteman III

I first heard of this through the Chicago Public Schools’ Department of Libraries and Information Services. They contacted my workplace about recommendations of Native-themed and/or Native-authored books for their department to recommend to all school libraries to purchase. While “Trickster” was not on the list they sent to us, it was inquired about due to the fact that Native elders told the stories.

“Trickster” is an anthology of twenty-one Native American stories that have been illustrated in a sequential format by comic books artists. Matt Dembicki writes in his afterword that he wanted to keep the stories authentic and written by Native storytellers. This piqued my interest, as I have seen the many varied results of keeping it “authentic to Natives”. So, seeing it in the resell bookstore and after some financial self-debate, I dropped $10 bucks on it to see what it was all about and to write this review.

When I think of comic books, I think superheroes immediately, as that is the dominant genre right now and has been for a long time. I could go into the same old shpeal about them being our new, modern mythology. Here in “Trickster” is a modern record of the old mythology from Native tribes across North America.

All of the stories have a Trickster character that is central to the story. Many are creation stories of how certain animals inherited traits, or of how certain landscapes are the way they are. Native American lore is full of creation stories of all kinds. Many of the stories are very colorful and well drawn. I enjoyed much of the stories like “Coyote and the Pebbles”, vey well drawn and told; “Giddy Up, Wolfie”, a hilarious tale of stealing girlfriends. I will always dig the animal trickster characters like Chuckfi. Also, I loved the simplicity of “How Wildcat caught a Turkey”. These stories feel familiar and new at the same time.

Some stories did have a large amount of text, almost defeating the purpose of it being produced in a comic book format. Also, other stories seemed hastily drawn and amateurish. What always takes me out of a comic book story is the rough and thick lines. You can always tell a practiced hand from an unpracticed one. I also disliked the near monochromatic coloring of some of the stories. That makes it boring. It evokes sepia tones. But what bugged me most, as always, is the depiction of Native Americans. I would have loved an artist to take a risk and set a story in contemporary times, or even out of time. As a Native, I know the story would transcend the look. It seems too easy to rely on the beads and feathers of long ago.

I am looking at this from the perspectives of being both Northern Arapaho and an artist. I am very much a proponent of Native American first-voice and self-representation in media and I find this a mixed bag. While the editor did his best to maintain the authenticity of the Native words, it felt sold out to the imagery of beads and feathers. The art is also a mixed bag with some very good renderings in the stories along side some not-so-good renderings. There were no risks taken and it all seemed played safe.

Still, the good outweighs the not-so-good in this “Trickster” collection. It is a more complete collection of first-voice narratives that I have come across in contemporary media. And it is the first Native collection in the comic book, sequential art format that I have seen, well, ever. With a respect and freehand given to the Native storytellers, this seems as good a place to start in the exploration of Native American Trickster tales and may introduce a younger generation of Native kids to these stories.

And for that purpose alone, I recommend Trickster. At least until we Native American Storytellers and Artists begin producing a series of Native stories by and for ourselves.

Recommended.

© 2010 Ernest M. Whiteman III


The Best of 2010 - Inception Review



INCEPTION
Directed by Christopher Nolan
Reviewed by Ernest M. Whiteman III

Chris Nolan has to be one of the best studio directors working in the Hollywood system right now. Nolan came up through Hollywood with a string of very capable and at times, complex films that captured the viewers’ attention; “Following”, “Memento”, “Insomnia” and “The Prestige”, a string of tightly constructed films that led viewers on a merry chase.

Nolan then garnered big movie laurels with his pair of film that revived a dying Batman franchise with “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight” which added depth and weight to what are on the surface comic book movies. So much so I overheard one little boy explaining to his father the reason he couldn’t see “batman” was because “batman is for grown-ups”. Yep, Nolan did that.

His latest “Inception,” about a team of thieves that enter your dreams and steal ideas is probably the best movie I have seen for 2010. Here, Leonardo DiCaprio hired by Ken Wantanbe, leads a team into the mind of Cillian Murphy to “plant” an idea rather than steal one. Through differing levels of Dream, DiCaprio is always trying to hide from his ex-wife, Marion Colliard who is out to ruin him.

What follows is a complex and action-packed heist on the level of Michael Mann’s “Heat”. Plus, like his other movies, no mater which direction the plot turns, you always felt like you were in the Now. And going for the ride has agreat pay off. The ideas and concepts in “Inception” are so twisting and turning with an ending that many still talk about today. Yep, Nolan did that.

It is also filled with many dazzling images and action set pieces; the Bond-esque snow chase and assault on the stronghold, the twisting and turning hallway as Joseph Gordon-Levitt floats through the air fighting off security and setting up his part of the plan. I came out of the theater smiling and thinking, how can I make a movie like that? And that is what makes a great movie for me. It has style as well as substance. Two things another big action movie lacked…

While many may think that it was not as strong as his past works, “Inception” remains stronger than anything Hollywood has put out in the last few years as a whole. It is the best movie I have seen this year.

High Recommendation

© 2010 Ernest M. Whiteman III

Wasted Talent



The Expendables
Directed by Sylvester Stallone
Reviewed by Ernest M. Whiteman III

I was so looking forward to this movie. I am a huge proponent of NOT adding nostalgia to current movies. But seeing the cast alone was enough to get me excited. Stallone himself is in a sort of filmmaking renaissance of late, with his directorial turns and returns with “Rocky Balboa” and the latest “Rambo”.

The movie is about a team of mercenaries made up of various action stars, including Sly himself, Jason Statham, Dolph Lundgren, and Jet Li. They take a puppet dictator who is not really evil and… well, that’s about it.

It is supposed to be a throwback to the 80’s action genre with its stunt casting and histrionic gun battles. The editing was hasty and made the scenes nonsensical. Their camaraderie seems a bit forced and the dialogue felt ill-timed. Like the best shots were used but not trimmed, that I could feel the gaps of time between line readings.

Sly’s character eventually tries to rescue the depot’s daughter simply because she turns him on and the hastily composed showdown really amounted to nothing. Hell, even Eric Roberts “Power Behind the Throne” monologues about he and Sly BEING THE SAME! Come on. When Sly steps out of his comfort zones, like Rocky and Rambo, he tends to fumble. He fumbled this, big time. He looked tired and sad.

What angers me is the amount of effort put into this. Sly broke his neck filming the fight with Steve Austin. To see the fight a choppy, sloppy mess made me sad.

Now this movie has its defenders but that is because they want it to matter, to be justified in their liking “manly, macho” movies of the past. The idea of that faux-manhood presented in violence and explosions is supposed to be revered and something to strive for. But that is not the world today.

“It is what it is” not longer has a place in the new cinema landscape. We are building a tendency to promote and support mediocrity. We do not strive for excellence. We want nostalgic nonsense. As a result, trash like “The Room” and “The Expendables” gain cult status.

You know what? I was just so damned disappointed. I really was. Walking out of the theater I was mute and just sad. Yeah, the movie made me sad. “Wasted Talent” is what comes to mind now. I just don’t want to talk about it any more. I have more to say but you can just come up and ask me about it. (Well, maybe not.)

Do not recommend. At all.

© 2010 Ernest M. Whiteman III

Sunday, September 12, 2010

"And then there's Rifftrax!"



“And then there’s RIFFTRAX!”

Rifftrax Live: Reefer Madness
August 19, 2010
Landmark Century 18, Evanston, IL
By Ernest M. Whiteman III

There are times in your pop culture-consuming life when you switch on the television and come upon something so absolutely “You”, that you suddenly cannot fathom life without it. Nor could you ever remember your life before it. You got it. It gets You. That connection is made in spite of the makers and the viewers being thousands of miles apart. You feel and believe that this show, this program was made for you, specifically for “You”.

That was Mystery Science Theater 3000 for me.

I am sure that was Mystery Science Theater 3000 for You too.

It was compelling in its concept, which was very simple and clean: making fun of bad movies. Yet it was never savage or mean. Biting and funny, sure, but never savagely mean, as most of television programming has become. It was the last shining beacon of satire, wrapped expertly into a sci-fi puppet show.

A true fan of the show makes no distinction between the Joel Years versus the Mike Years as the core of the show itself remains true to You, and You got it.

You see? I love movies with every fiber of my being. I love them. As with any love you can stand the criticisms of your love. And this show understood that. It got You.

Then after a few troubled years being jostled by the very networks it helped, Mystery Science Theater 3000 ended. But its spirit lives on in such projects and Cinematic Titanic (from show creator Joel Hodgeson) and the Internet sensation Rifftrax, created by Mike Nelson and currently featuring latter day robots Kevin Murphy and Bill Corbett.

Rifftrax is a downloadable commentary track, usually made by Mike, Kevin and Bill that can be synched with a DVD movie and enjoyed at home. Because of the technology of today these commentaries can be enjoyed with some current movies of today. Something MST3K was unable to due to rights issues. But because of Rifftrax’s association with MST3K, movie commentary is back.

And as a fan, I could not be happier for it. Sure, they could bring the show back but that is neither here nor there. Also, as a filmmaker, I found MST3K as useful as any film school course. Which is the highest compliment I could pay to that classic show.

On August 19, 2010 Fathom Events presented “Rifftrax Live: Reefer Madness” at select movie theaters across the country. This is the third Rifftrax Live event I have attended in the theater after “Plan 9 from Outer Space” and their, “Christmas Shorts 'Straveganza”.

While I thoroughly enjoy the downloadable commentaries that I have seen, nothing beats seeing Mike, Kevin and Bill live and riffing on movies. Sure, there is a detachment from seeing it beamed into a local Cineplex but in essence that is how it should be seen, in a movie theater.

Plus, the energy of a live crowd seems to bring out an extra glee in the Boys. They are quick to adlib making for some great moments. With “Reefer Madness” they debuted three unseen short films, “More Deadly than Dynamite”, “Grass” (Which is earning, quite aptly, a cult status of its own among the fans.) and “Aesop’s Fables: Frozen Follies” which had nothing to do with Aesop as far as I could tell.

I have never seen nor purchased the “Rifftrax: Reefer Madness” DVDs so I was coming into this with a clean slate as I understand that much of the riffs are recycled from previous commentaries. They seemed to excel at riffing the short film as they contained the jokes that I remember most. It is always golden whenever Mike can work in a “There Will Be Blood” reference. I believe because they have a limited time frame with the short films that they come up with “A” material for those while at times the riffs in Reefer seemed like filler.

What made MST3K work was that they broke up the features with skits and judicious editing. It is like stand-up in front of a live audience where you are given a time limit and you can come up with great adlibs. With Reefer I found myself smiling more than laughing out loud like I did with something like “At Your Fingertips: Grass” which in between bouts of laughter I found myself proclaiming over and over “What the Hell?”

I did not care much for the shorts by Lowtax or any of the other guests they have had in the past. They seemed to be distracted and out of place. I would like to suggest, as a fan, Rifftrax come up with new material for the live movie events rather than recycle the DVD commentaries. It sounded practiced and not fresh and energetic. That would be my harshest critique of the event. Other than that, seeing Mike, Kevin and Bill interact with the audience and each other is always a fun and funny treat. What I enjoyed the most is the camaraderie between Mike, Kevin and Bill. That part is what endears the fans to the premise of Rifftrax Live.

I look froward to their next live event. Whether you are a fan of Cinematic Titanic or Rifftrax, it behooves you to catch any incarnation live. It is worth it to see old friends like Mike, Kevin and Bill, and Joel, Trace, Josh, Mary Jo and TV’s Frank still out there, dedicated, and providing you with what they do the best: getting You.

Highest Recommendation

© 2010 Ernest M. Whiteman III