Monday, October 21, 2013

What's Your Style?

“What’s your style?”
The Grandmaster
Directed by Wong Kar Wai
A review by
Ernest M. Whiteman III
I usually peg on pretty quickly which movie has become my favorite for the year the instant I walk out of the theater. The movie has to engross me with its story and characters, it needs to thrill me with its innovation, it needs to inspire me to make my own movies and it needs to have me grinning like a fool just thinking about it as I walk out of the theater and long afterwards.
The Grandmaster, the latest film from Wong Kar Wai, did just that. In a sea of same-looking blockbusters that did nothing but take the money from your pocket, “The Grandmaster” offered a unique visual style, keen action sequences and a touching love story at the heart of its non-linear narrative.
I know, I know, Donnie Yen, Badass, blah, blah, blah. “The Grandmaster” elevates itself by not playing to the pretense of a kung fu movie but by being a movie about kung fu. Styles are discussed and displayed, how these styles reflect the philosophies of how the practitioners live and use their martial arts is reflected by the character conflicts within the broken narratives.
The great Tony Leung (In the Mood for Love, Hard-Boiled, Red Cliff I & II) takes the role of Ip Man, a renowned master in the fighting form of Wing Chung, is selected to display the Southern Style of kung fu before the Northern Grandmaster, who is not portrayed as a rival or an enemy. Instead of a huge fight, which we would have gotten with the Donnie Yen series, we get a philosophical showdown between to competing masters with Ip showing how his flexibility in form matches his flexibility in philosophy and life. Seeing his vision for kung fu limits, the Grandmaster cedes his title to Ip Man.
In revenge for defeating her father, Gong Er (Zhang Ziyi, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Hero, House of Flying Daggers) challenges Ip Man to a duel to regain, not only her father’s honor, but also the honor of their house and kung fu philosophy. In a moment of concern, Ip Man loses the duel but sets off a long distance infatuation that spans the rest of their lives. Here, at the core of this movie about kung fu is a story of unrequited attraction – we are in Wong Kar Wai territory now and he makes the story his own.
Most audiences are satisfied with “balls-to-the-wall” action of modern cinema, the brutality of one person beating another, the show of dominance. Movies are not supposed to try and elevate above that; movies are entertainment, they are not meant to provoke thought but only to give you something to do for a few hours, give you something to cheer. But, “The Grandmaster” elevates the themes of Style of Life/Self above its king fu roots. That is what I loved about it.
We quickly follow Ip Man’s life through the Second World War and his move to Hong Kong to make a living after losing his family’s fortune. Here he reconnects with Gong Er and his desire to see her skills in a rematch are thwarted due to a long-ago promise she made. The film then shifts to Gong Er and of the sacrifices she makes to reclaim her father’s kung fu legacy after his prized student usurps the claim of grandmaster, resulting in her father’s death. What follows is an inspired showdown at a train station as Gong Er “takes” back her family’s legacy. Then, we catch up with Ip Man again as they reunite years later and Gong Er is ready to tell Ip Man how she feels because she cannot do more, the same as Ip. Two people dedicated to their life’s philosophies and cannot move beyond their friendship. We then see why Gong Er cannot do so. Ip Man moves on in his instruction of his students, in voiceover, tells us the ending of Gong Er’s sad story.
In the end, I am sure “The Grandmaster” will not sway many fans of martial arts movies. Many enjoy the harsher films that are about the winning of fights and the razzle-dazzle of awesome fight sequences, when all this is completely counter to the philosophies of kung fu, which is more of a method of self-discipline and control. It is not what martial arts movies diverted kung fu to be, what MMA and UFC diverted kung fu into – the winning of fights, the show of physical dominance over an opponent, all the things counter to what Ip Man, as well as Bruce Lee espoused, both of whom followers of MMA and UFC ironically idolize. Note, I stated, “diverted”, not “perverted”, because in that method of self-control is still a method of building the physical and a system of fighting in self-defense, these indeed are martial arts. The divergence is in how these are used.
Are they used to build your character and how to live a good life or simply to win fights on TV? So, the question Tony Leung as Ip Man asks in the tag of the film should resonate more than many will understand, “What’s your style?”
He is not asking your fighting style. He is asking how did you perceive the movie that came before, as just another martial arts movie that you were disappointed in, or something that touches on something deeper about how you live a life overall? Ip Man sticks to his discipline throughout the film, even in this story’s central attraction to Gong Er. She has fallen in love with him but he is a principled man and the only way he can show affection is to challenge her to a duel, because going further would dishonor himself, his wife, his family and his whole philosophy of self-discipline.
American audiences and filmmakers have never understood the philosophies of martial arts, martial arts movies in particular or Asian cinema in general. Take a look at recent films such as “Cloverfield” and “Pacific Rim” and their utter failure at attaining what Japanese Kaizu films are about. To many, it is about a giant monster destroying a city or a man in a rubber suit crushing miniatures. The Kaizu film began with “Gojira” (Godzilla) and was an allegory on the destructive might and consequences of atomic power, which the Japanese knew first hand. Here, instead we get a might makes right in the destruction of the creatures and that nuclear weapons are the answer.
My best example of this misunderstanding is Zhang Yimou’s “Hero” which many fans love because of the stylized fights, yet many more detest for its seeming approval of dictatorships as a means to peace. This point is sort of apparent because we, as American audiences tend to forget that China still lives under said dictatorship and censors its movies heavily, so a message like that would have to seem apparent. Though, a film like “Hero” still manages to sneak its strongest message in very subtly, so subtly in fact, that its went over practically everyone’s head. That message: a message of self-control gleaned from the self-discipline of martial arts that leads to ultimate peace.
Not about winning or control, but a philosophy of self. That the first Emperor of China realizes this message of self at the cusp of his domination that then renders him a virtual prisoner to his own brutal philosophy of control. Hence the closing shot of him in his throne room, tiny in the frame, a cell of his own making.
Wong’s “The Grandmaster” presents the same philosophy of self in the context of the standard martial arts fighting movie. It is all in the way we see the film. How many movies do that? Leave it for you to interpret? Trusts its audience to see beyond the trappings of its genre? “Pacific Rim” didn’t. Which is why that movie failed for me and why “The Grandmaster” does not.
A couple of things that stood out to me the times I watched “The Grandmaster”. First, when he readies to face the Northern Grandmaster he is tutored by three southern masters, the first is a woman who is a master of Bagua, a circular fighting system. What caught my eye the second time I watched it, was that she had bound feet. Meaning, her feet were broken as a child, bound and fit into slippers. To show that she mastered Bagua despite having bound feet reveals her strength of character and tenacity.
The other thing that really stood out was a scene late in the film that moved me to tears. I did not think it would happen again when I went to see the film a second time, yet when the scene played again, I felt the tears well and was not embarrassed to wipe them away. It moved me, the scene. There is a great heart underneath the veneer of this martial arts movie.
In a summer of many, many huge tent pole films, I find myself saying that Wong Kar Wai’s “The Grandmaster” is the best movie I have seen this year. It has a heart within that it wears openly and asks you to trust it in its questioning of your spirit, what is your style? In doing so, it reveals how you really see cinema. I do not know much about martial arts at all. I have never studied or took part in the training of a particular style. But, thanks to Wong Kar Wai’s “The Grandmaster”, I have a better idea of how kung fu can reflect a Style of Self.
Highly Recommended

2013 Ernest M. Whiteman III

Gravity - A Review

GRAVITY
Directed by Alfonso Cuarón
Reviewed by Ernest M. Whiteman III
Oh, Spoilers, I guess…

I had the pleasure of being able to purchase an “IMAX 3D Experience” ticket on the opening weekend for Cuarón’s latest movie. It was a visually joy to behold. For me, this movie falls on the opposite end of the barometer with “Pacific Rim”. Both have Mexican directors telling simple science fiction stories using high-tech computer graphics. Where “Pacific Rim” failed was in its complete misunderstanding of its genre, “Gravity” succeeds is in its use of technology to tell its story, anchored by two, subtle, realistic performances and not shrill people mugging because giant robots fighting giant monsters is cool.
This movie pares away the unnecessary elements of hyperbolic moviemaking. It creates the situation by creating the environment as close to reality as possible. Sure, there are scientific errors to be sure. A filmmaker is making this movie, not an astrophysicist, and visuals and situations are key to telling the story.
The story is a simple one. While on a mission to repair the Hubble Space Telescope a pair of astronauts are caught in a life or death situation high above the earth as debris from a destroyed satellite tears their shuttle apart, cutting off communications, literally stranding them in space. They, then have a series of 90-minute windows to try to reach some sort of safety before the debris hits again. Will they make it?
While absolutely not the best picture I have seen this year (That is still “The Grandmaster”), it is still a great movie with some stunning visuals, awesome 3D imagery, great cinematography, all anchored by a great performance by Sandra Bullock, and one of the best sound designs ever. For once, space is quiet. The music is used to create the emotional anchors that a sound design would sell in any other movie.
It is probably one of the very few really great 3D movies I have seen since I gave 3D a chance. It is the 3D that sells the space, the situations, and the dangers. This is how you use 3D to tell your story in a movie, I think.
Unfortunately, the film missteps with its dip into sentimental, existential spiritualism, which completely robs the triumph the human spirit, enterprise, and ingenuity of its victorious moment in the story. In this I mean, during the whole story, we see their absolute will to overcome the situation and how they succeed on sheer might of will and ingenuity. Once it dips into this sentimentality, it sort of robs all they went through and overcame of its meaning. Of course, that is one way of interpreting the ending.
I can understand why they would include it. To give the main character an arc of salvation, a turning point. But in this case, literal salvation – simple survival, is robbed of its triumph by its inclusion. The mere act of saving life becomes belittled because it needs to be attached to some grand cause. It did not jibe for me.
Still, the story surrounding that moment, the characters, the visuals, the 3D and the adherence to verisimilitude are more than enough to carry this into being one of my favorites of the year by one of my favorite directors.
Recommended in “IMAX” 3D!

Note: I put the "IMAX" in quotes because we all know that those large screens they tout as IMAX at the multiplex are not really IMAX screens.


2013 Ernest M. Whiteman III

Monday, September 16, 2013

IT MEANS "HOPE"?


“It Means ‘Hope’”?
A Review of MAN OF STEEL
Directed by Zack Snyder
Reviewed by Ernest M. Whiteman III
Okay, let’s get this out up front. I was never a big Superman fan. I love the character of Batman. Ask anyone. As a child did you ever go though this thing with your siblings of “You can’t like that because I like that!”?
I did. Because of it I could not be a fan of the Oakland Raiders, the Boston Celtics, Elvis Presley and Batman. In those early formative years, this silly childish behavior also molded my individuality. Screw it, I’ll like The Rams, Johnny Cash and Captain Marvel. (Which is why I wore a kerchief around my neck constantly. We have lots of pictures of me as a kid with a gold or red kerchief tied on as a cape.) I think the Celtics was the first time I asserted my own preference in that “Well, I can like them too!”
Because Batman was banned to me as a kid (Thanks Ken.), I gravitated toward Captain Marvel because Superman never really captured my imagination. Or maybe Forrest or Dalco liked him first. But the idea of flying did. Also, what I was into was movies. Again, that was thanks to my dad and his Super 8 projector. I also grew up reading comic books, mostly sci-fi. The few I was able to buy were movie adaptations like “Star Trek the Motion Picture”. (Really.) My first comic book subscriptions were “Star Wars” and “Conan the Barbarian”. (The latter thanks to Ken’s insistence.) But I did not become a fan of Superman until the 1978 Richard Donner film. After that, I bought anything attached to the Superman movie.
It captured my imagination and set the standard of on-screen Supermen for many, many years. I saw all but Superman IV in the theater. By the time Superman VI came out, it was struggling at Golan-Globas and our local theaters for some reason stopped showing the mainstream fare. I think it was due to theatric fees that theaters pay to run the big films. You see, back then, most small towns had local Mom-and-Pop theaters run by local business folk and they paid out of profits for movies. So, many, to keep up in the escalating cost of everything in the eighties, had to paid for the cheap movies. Riverton got what would amount to DTV movies or “direct to video” movies.
But, enough about nostalgia, this review is not about nostalgia. This is a review of Zack Snyder’s “Man of Steel”. There is no place for nostalgia here.
REVIEW
When it was announce that Zack Snyder would be directing the new Superman movie, it sort of made sense to me. I am really not a fan of his movies. His “300” and “The Watchmen” were some of the more trite comic book movies out there. Yet, when I saw his animated feature, “The Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’hoole” I was suddenly struck that maybe he could do something really great, especially with his stylistic flourishes that he is known for. The many flying battle sequences and the attached mythology of the story in “The Legends of the Guardians” made me feel that Zack Snyder was the right director for a Superman for the new century.
We begin again on Krypton with scientist Jor El trying to convince the ruling council to evacuate the planet due to their overuse and stripping of the natural resources that has caused the planet core to become unstable. In the middle of all this, military leader General Zod stages a coup to preserve Kryptonian culture. Jor El then sends his infant son to Earth with the codex of Krytonian genetics in him. For that, Zod kills Jor El but his cronies and he are immediately arrested and banished to the Phantom Zone. Then, Krypton explodes.
Kal El, the son, lands on Earth and is raised by the Kents. Here the movie takes the familiar story and opens it up for examination as we follow Clark in his search to find his place in the world. As a youth he has exhibited great powers, which his adopted father (Kevin Costner) tries to keep secret. But young Clark empathy towards humanity leads him off to walk the Earth saving people as a sort of silent guardian, a watchful protector, keeping his power a secret from the rest of the world for fear of rejecting and attacking him. How much this affects Clark is evident as he is unable to fully integrate into humanity. He remains a loner.
Enter, Lois Lane, Daily Planet reporter on the hunt for this mysterious guardian angel. She discovers Clark’s secret and after hearing his story of why he keeps it secret decides to not reveal him to the world. They meet when Clark finds an abandoned Krytonian ship in the Arctic and it is revealed to him, who he really is.
Zod returns from the Phantom Zone after the destruction of Krypton and for the last few decades has been traveling the depths of space searching for the remnants of their people, which leads them to Earth, having been led there once Clark activated the abandoned ship’s power, which sent a signal into space. Zod arrives looking for Kal El and the Codex and threatens the planet unless Kal El surrenders to him.
Here, Superman makes his first appearance to humanity as he agrees to turn himself to Zod to save lives. Zod then decides to terraform Earth into a new Krypton and using the Codex to remake the Kryptonian race. It is then up to Superman to stop him. In the middle of this, Kal El must choose between the humanity that could reject and fear him or turn to his fellow Kryptonians that only want to dominate the only home he has ever had.
Here is how much the movie impacted me: I had to look up that synopsis on Wikipedia. Overall, I did enjoy the movie. It was the most ambitious attempt at retelling the Superman Origin for new audiences.
What I loved most about this adaptation is its earnest tone. It takes everything about the mythology at face value and explores it deeper that past movies have done. Mostly, all comic book movie stories end up being one story, whether or not they should be the superhero. It works for the normal human granted huge powers and responsibilities, but what about Superman? He has the powers borne in him. That is where Superman differs and where stories about him ultimately fall apart.
Here, they are treating it as a first contact story. Not whether Clark Kent should be Superman but where is Superman’s place in humanity. Some of the Justice League cartoons covered this very well and I am glad to se that the new movie went in this direction.
Its seriousness is in contrast to the beloved Richard Donner film, which got goofy and slap sticky in the third act. The Donnor film and the Burton Batman burdened their films with a wacky, comic villain, a silly, land-grubbing Lex Luthor and a silly, clownish Joker, which Nolan tossed right the fuck out. Here we get another rehashed villain from another past sequel film: General Zod. But here the villain is integrated with the hero’s origin unlike Star Trek Into Darkness where he was just Khan for being Khan’s sake.
The tone, the acting and the music were great. Seeing Superman master his powers was inspiring. Henry Cavill makes a great Superman and a very human Clark Kent. He watches college football and drinks beer! He’s one of us! But faced with the destruction of his new home, he must choose to rise above and take on a greater responsibility in looking after the world now that alien life is proven to be out there.
The downside is that in Nolan’s Batman movies, we were given a caper but he also built towards the ending of every film. Look back at every one of Nolan’s Batman movies and you get some great endings that were dictated by the story being told. Here, Synder just cannot match that. He simply puts everyone where they are supposed to be. With some minor changes to the myth; Lois knows who he is and Superman isn’t interested in protecting the U.S.’ interests. Well, nor should he be, but that is neither here nor there.
So, let’s talk about the controversial ending. I am sure you’ve heard by now and so I will not be spoiling anything for you, in a moment in which he must choose in subduing the villain at the risk of some human lives, Superman kills Zod. Many had a problem with it. “Superman doesn’t kill!” they cried. But this is a different Superman. Besides, that’s Batman you’re thinking of. Here, Superman knows he is responsible for the lives being threatened by Zod, who swore to kill them all. Superman knows he can only hold him at bay since Zod quickly mastered his new earthbound powers. There was only one way to insure that Zod did not do that. It was a crucial moment in the development of this new Superman.
You might cry about all the destroyed buildings and the people lost in those. Yes, there were some casualties, but that lends to the importance of Superman’s decision. Besides, you cannot have two super-powered beings fighting in a city and not see the destruction that would create. More folks say that Superman should have flown somewhere isolated, but they are mixing the old Zod with the new. The old Terrence Stamp Zod was focus on subjugating Superman and only came to harm humans as a means to do so. So, Superman took off to the North Pole. This Zod promised to kill every single human on earth to make Kal El pay. If Superman had flown off, Zod would have stayed and killed everyone.
Then, there is the fight: Since the collapse of “Superman Returns all the Fanboys were saying, “I wanna see Superman punch something!” and guess what, when he does, we see that that gets pretty boring, pretty damn quick. So we complain about the “endless action” that we wanted to begin with and pretend we wanted a good story and characterizations. Lying hypocrites. We got what we wanted and when it turns out to be not-very good, we try to cover it up by pretending we wanted something else. The ending fight did get tedious for me, but what else would happen when Superman fights Zod? My little girl, who saw it with me, declared it “Good, but it had too many explosions at the end. But, that’s Zack Snyder.”
What more could I add to that? “Man of Steel”, it does have a lot going for it and overall I enjoyed it enough to see it twice. I will probably appreciate it more as time goes on and it does make me long for the Superman/Batman sequel despite its casting of Ben Affleck. Because in the end, it is a Superman movie and Batman simply should not overshadow Superman in his own movie. I remain hopeful….
Recommend.

2013 Ernest M. Whiteman III

Sunday, September 15, 2013

His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking


He is intelligent, but not experienced.
His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking
 Review of Star Trek Into Darkness
Directed by JJ Abrahms
Reviewed by Ernest M. Whiteman III
Space, the final frontier….
Star Trek used to mean something in the golden age of television. It was a joke to network executives and they cancelled it after its third season, sold off the rerun rights for cheap and in the intervening 20-odd years of syndication, went on to become one of the largest worldwide franchises with a tested and faithful fanbase that supported it to extreme ends. Hell, they even got a space shuttle named “Enterprise”.
One of the mainstays of the series, which is why many Nerds glommed onto it, was its particular use of actual scientific principles in the telling of the story. Yes, Star Trek is the start of the blurring line between Geek and Nerds. I just suddenly realized that.
For those of you who do not know, Gene Roddenberry had to severely dumb down his idea to get the pilot sold to NBC. Its original pilot episode (which never aired) “The Cage” was deemed “too cerebral”, “too intellectual” and that it was too slow with “not enough action”. It was rejected for series but a second more action-packed pilot was ordered and based on that, the series was put into production by NBC.
The original pilot was about the captain of the Enterprise, Christopher Pike being caged in a zoo and expected to procreate. So as you see, not too action-packed. It featured Jeffrey Hunter in the lead, with Majel Barrett as the second-in-command in a time when Women’s Lib was barely a movement. The crew and story was later integrated into the series in the two-part “Menagerie”, where Spock hijacks the Enterprise to save his friend and first Captain, Pike. Pike has since gone onto to mythical status in Star Trek lore.
I must say here that I am in no way ‘nostalgic” for the 1982 Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. While I do hold it up as the best of the Star Trek movies, I can easily state that it is general “nostalgia” for the movie that ruins the current Star Trek Into Darkness. The branding of the new Star Trek movies has reached an absurd level that the movie itself I could not take serious at all.
Star Trek Into Darkness” is the follow-up to 2009’s “Star Trek” which was a sort of continuation/reboot of the Star Trek film franchise. First of all, Benedict Cumberbatch is Khan Noonien Singh. I am not spoiling anything with that, I mention it now because it adds absolutely f*ck-all to the movie. It means nothing. Except that maybe Oh-VER uh-NUNN-see-AY-SHUN takes the PLAYs of ACH-ting. (Purse your beak.)
So, we begin with a quick-paced race to save Spock’s life from an erupting volcano, which leads to Kirk getting demoted because Spock would not lie for Kirk. They are not friends yet.
A terrorist attack on a TOP SECRET SECTOR of Starfleet (read: conspiracy) leads to the possibility of militarizing Starfleet which leads to another attack that kills off my favorite character in the Rebootiverse: Pike. Which leads to Kirk and Spock tracking Khan to Klingon space. Because revenge. (And so we can finally see the New Klingons! And they look… just like Klingons… huh.) They end up capturing Khan which leads to the revelation of the conspiracy to militarize Starfleet which means that Starfleet was complicit in those said attacks to accomplish that. Still with me? Good. Because all of this mean f*ck-all as well.
They go attack the escaped Khan who blasts the hell out of the Enterprise because we loves us a space ship battle. People get double-crossed. Then Kirk saves the crippled Enterprise by irradiating himself and effectively, well, MOSTLY killing him and Spock gets to scream KHAAAAAAN this time and fights Khan on a moving something before realizing that Khan’s magic blood can save Kirk and all of this leads up to them being friends. Finally.
Told you all that conspiracy nonsense meant nothing. Too bad all those people had to die in those attacks just to make sure that Spock cannot quit Kirk. Going through non-stop action takes the place of character building I guess. They are exactly the same people after the events of the movie as at the beginning but they are simply friends now.
That is it in a nutshell.
All of the charm and goodwill gained with the first movie is completely lost on an unimaginative, empty follow-up. It is like wearing a fantastic Spider-man shirt to school and everyone thinks you are cool. So, you wear it over and over again.
For the longest time, Bad Robot and JJ Abrams told the public that they would not rehash Khan in their new Rebootiverse and that we might get something, dare we say, original. Fans of the television show were happy that while this might not be “their” Star Trek, the public can now see what they have seen this whole time: a science fiction series that proliferated that idea that the best of our humanity was still ahead of us and should be something to strive for and how it affects our exploration of the cosmos and dealing with new life and new civilizations without the shackles of our worst instincts and without the shackles of past TV and movie continuity. We would boldly go and explore strange new world with these new movies that now have a modern sensibility that could capture the imagination of the youth of today and steer them to question and inspire them to explore without the shackles of our worst instincts.
What we got instead was a well-made piece of pop nostalgia branding with lots of s’plosions. The series is dumbed-down once again to appeal to a bigger audience. JJ Abrams shows some real skill in making a movie but shows little understanding of the series he is making. Hence the quote describing Khan, which is quite apt here, “He is intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking.” JJ does not understand the series he supposedly “saved” and why it had a specific appeal.
When I was growing up I was called a “Math Nerd”. I never gave that label to myself. I earned that from the ire of fellow schoolmates by being at the top of the class in all my math classes at St. Stephen’s Indian High School. “Fucking nerd,” they would say when I refused to let them cheat off me. Believe me, there was once a time when being called a Nerd was NOT a good thing. It was a passive-aggressive attack on your intelligence and self-esteem. It was meant to humble you to the point of actually wanting to stop being smart and being absorbed into the regular crowd and that give an excuse for others to beat up on you and make fun of you. But I liked math too much, as much as I loved reading, drawing, movies and comic books. I was a nerd in math and English and a geek about movies and comics.
Lately, there seems to be this pervading usurpation of term “Nerd”, which I feel, stems from this egotistical need to look both humble and intelligent at the same time without really accomplishing the intelligence. Now, look at the first 42 seconds or so of thisvideo as it sort of sums up the issues rather well. You can tell that this guy was probably never called a Nerd in his life. (Or maybe he was as a child, I don’t know.) But no one would ever call him one now. But because of his admitted love of comic books, for some reason he is allowed to take up that title. He calls himself "a nerd" simply because he likes Batman.
Milhouse from “The Simpsons” had the correct definition of being a geek versus being a nerd. “Nerds are smart”. Geeks tend to be geeky about specific things that have nothing to do with intelligence (Or, higher intelligence, to not be insulting.) – comic books, movies, sewing, costuming, D&D, science fiction, fantasy, board games, action figures, swords collecting, trading cards and the list goes on. Hobbies. Nerds were only into one or two things that had a lot to do with math or sciences, with intelligence – chemistry, astronomy, physics (both theoretical and applied), computer technology, calculus and so forth. All are subjects that deal with knowledge and intelligence and they were outcast due to their devotion to such subjects.
But somewhere along the way we mixed both of them together and because we did, when certain people find themselves “into” such things as comic books, sci fi and the like, they feel qualified to call themselves nerds though that label has no bearing. We should be doing away with labels all together but there is also this thing out there: the egotistical victimhood of fighting a status quo. (Which I will write more about in a future edition of Wisdom of the Sages and how it pertains to Native American identity and protests.)
Remember when Congress was holding hearings on that Internet Piracy Bill? They wanted to understand how the Internet worked and would state things like “It’s time to call the nerds in to explain this.” Remember? Well, they we actually using the label right because it was attached to a form of education and science and it was used to insult the intelligent. Can you imagine that guy in the motorcyle video showing up and saying “I’m a nerd ‘cause I likes comic books.”
See my point?
Even now, celebrities tend to garner attention for being into The Avengers or Star Wars or all those ladies who dress like Wonder Woman or Slave Leia from “Return of the Jedi” or jocks wearing Boba Fett shirts or hipsters wearing Power Rangers tees (But can never tell you their favorite story line from the comics or shows). It is all a façade to boost our egos into trying to look like humble little nerds that like science fiction without ever having to crack open a real science book.
My solution: do away with both labels and let people be into what they are into without invoking ire or causing those to be outcast simply because they are smarter than the rest of us. Which is another reason we are usurping that title. Our society is on a downward curve, it is actually dumbing down in almost all arenas of society and it is simply too difficult to be smart. We would rather hide behind superstition and myths rather than face the real world.
Now, I know what you are thinking right now. You read most of this before. Also, with such a great build up to getting a good, in-depth review about the new Star Trek movie, all I gave you was shallow, sarcastic fluff piled on top of something you already were familiar with.
Congratulations!
You got exactly what I got out of Star Trek Into Darkness.
Do Not Recommend.

2013 Ernest M. Whiteman III



Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Best of 2012



Wisdom of the Sages Reviews
2012 Best of Stuff Lists
Well here we are with yet another year come and gone. It seemed that 2012 went by a lot faster. Maybe because we had so much to do. As we wind down the year I decided to once again put up what I though were the best of things for this past year.
Every year I put pressure on myself to do this because I operate a couple of blogs that no one really reads. I am very aware that no one cares about my opinion of things either, or we would be discussing such things. But yell out a political claim or use the dead to back my opinions and boy-howdy there’s a shoutin’ match. Oh well. Besides it is always fun to look back and as Joel Hodgeson says about looking back at the past “You always know what you’re going to say.”
Let’s begin this shall we?
TOP MUSIC BUYS of 2012
Again, as in previous years I have not bought a lot of music lately. I listen to music mostly through YouTube videos these days as CD, albums or other music media forms are becoming obsolete and radio stations are becoming virtually undistinguishable and obsolete as well. So, I just stick to the groups and singers that I have listened to for years. I don’t even know who the latest “big thing” is in music anymore.
This list is short and limited to what I purchased rather than the new things I thought were cool. Because all of it isn’t. Cool, I mean. Or New, either, come to think of it. Here we go:
Danielle Ate the Sandwich – Like A King (compact disc purchase)
Self-produced, singer/songwriter Danielle Anderson’s fourth effort sprang from a public Kickstarter campaign. While not her strongest effort, it does boast some strong songs. Initially, it suffers from a lot of the same things artists of this genre do: the fans.
It begins with a Squirrel Nut-Hipster BS riffed ditty called “Faith in a Man” with a stand-up bass, and a scratchy violin backing her ukulele. When I first heard this, she played it solo at a live performance and the intimacy lent strength to the lyrics and the tempo seemed to give added weight to the song overall but this is clearly the song they spent the most money on. Overly produced, now it comes off as a gimmick song. Seeing the music video as well, made me realize how much fan service is being paid to thank the Kickstarter backing.
The strongest songs of Danielle Ate the Sandwich seem to be the ones where she steps outside her comfort zone of uke-strumming and quirky lyrics. As such, “Indiana” is a great song. The riff alone added to the melancholy of her singing, which gives it the feel of a road song. I played this as I drove back and forth to my job in Wisconsin. “Evolution” another song I first heard live captures the irony of tone and lyric in tandem of one another. She tackles human equity and measures it against the evolution of mankind, not as a species but in ideology, and ties it together with her sweet-sugar-rush twang. (She should record a live album. Seriously.) “Like a King” is a sweet number about the mis-satisfaction of materialism.
Her strongest song, certainly on this album but also her oeuvre is “The Have-Nots” as gentle at the beginning ode to questioning religion then builds to an epic chant of trying to find faith as an individual in the world. Quite possibly one of my favorite songs overall.
The rest of the album, unfortunately, sounds overly familiar to her earliest works that I cannot discern them one from the other now as I write this. A strumming line, a gimmicky opening lyric and refrain about something longed for. They sound like steps backwards. But in the spots where she does shine, like “Indiana”, like “Evolution”, like, uh, “Like a King” and especially, “The Have-Nots”, she shines very bright and her potential is vocal, in bloom and infectious. You want her to succeed based on these songs.
Danielle Ate the Sandwich sits at a precipice of artistry that can find her churning out same-sounding fan-service or she can take wing, push the boundaries, of not only her song writing but of her best instrument – her voice.
It is a hitherto unforeseen precipice for all independent artists, from singer-song writers like Danielle to Hip Hop rappers. They reach a point that they mistake creativity by output and begin churning out same-sounding works like it is a factory job rather than expression of art. Then they wonder why their singles don’t sell. (Because it sounds the same as the last song.) Still, I think she can take wing and build something stronger than ever. We fans simply have to NOT drag her down. Or maybe I’m thinking too much about it.
Sammy Llanas – “It Don’t Bother Me” (digital download single)
This song comes from his solo effort with his band Absinthe. It has been out for a while but I only recently bought the single this year having run across it on YouTube after attending a concert of his at a local neighborhood arts festival. Now, the demise of the BoDeans is a sad and multi-voiced story and fans have lined up on either side with Kurt or Sammy, both stating that the other side is to blame and others saying that they don’t care as long as the music continues. For me, the BoDeans are done. Gone. Kaput. Forever. The BoDeans were Kurt AND Sammy, always have been.
But hearing Sammy that night attack old songs and new with a gusto that I thought gone after the break-up. He rocked and rolled and restored my faith in him as a solo artist because he did not cling to the legacy of the BoDean to try it as a solo artist. Sure, he sang the songs he wrote with the band but he laid out new ones as well. It was a masterful performance in a tiny venue. Kurt still has the BoDeans name to draw the bigger crowds. Sammy had no such crutch to lean on and yet he did not need one. I planted my flag firmly in Camp Llanas that night. Not to say I am against Kurt and the New BoDeans. I haven’t heard the entire story. But like most people, actually ALL people, I just listen more to things that prop up my own side and opinions. To me anyway, Sammy’s voice lent a heart and soul to the work of the BoDeans.
This particular sing struck me with its nonchalance about the world crumbling around a personal life and still moving on. It struck me as a personal ballad for both Sammy and myself and that connection is something that few artists try for any more. A truly great tune.
Tamera Podemski – “So Damn Beautiful” (digital download single)
Podemski as a singer is how I first encountered her. Her producers sent the film festival a copy of the music video for her song “Meegwitch”. Then, later, I noticed her in Sterlin Harjo’s “Four Sheets to the Wind” and in that she was at the same time both tough and vulnerable and pretty damn sexy. (Why aren’t Indian women allowed to be sexy when there are soooo many sexy Indian women?) I have a crush on Tamera Podemski.
Her song “So Damn Beautiful” is a lustful and strong piece about longing and wanting what you cannot have. It is sexy and torrid and it carries a damn fine vocal showcase and turn-of-phrase by Podemski. This song got me through some rough times a few years back and only now did I think of purchasing it via online. I highly recommend this song because it is so out of line with what is out there by Native artists. Every one else is flutes and colonization. This is about wanting and lusting. Which makes it a refreshing change of pace for “Native Music”….

So, that’s it for music. Shall we move on to the printed page? This year, Nooks were introduced to the family via Bonnie’s new job. I care nothing for e-readers and still love to hold a paperbound book when I read. It seems to be a generational thing. I am not above being hypocritical and working on my own publishing for e-readers. As always, it is not about what came out this year but what I bought or received:
Top Books of 2012
A Song of Fire and Ice: Book Two – A Clash of Kings, George RR Martin – I got this for Christmas and I have yet to read it. That Bonnie and Char were excited for me to have it makes it special. Since the first book is turning out great, I am looking forward to this one.
The Dark Knight Rises: Novelization, Greg Cox – I bought this used and reading it continuously in the waiting period after the movie left the theater and was released on DVD. I must have read it three times. It is a quick read. It fills in the gaps of the film and helped with the Dark Knight withdrawals. It is a fun little book, which reveals a quasi-outcome for The Joker character not in the film. I would not recommend it because the entire planet hated The Dark Knight Rises.
Robopocalypse, Daniel H. Wilson – This book is quite a treat. Written by Cherokee author Danial Wilson, this was the first major book I read this past year that I put down “Three Kingdoms” for. It is about the aftermath of a robot uprising told in multiple stories, sort of like Max Brook’s “World War Z” but more immediate to the events and not a long-after recollection. Steven Spielberg is producing and directing a movie based on this for release in 2014. Overall, a fun and scary read that does not over laden the reader with Author-is-Smart jargon. I recommend this heartily even for younger readers as it will ignite their imaginations in a world that is now and is possible and the idea that there are sometimes frightening consequences to humanity’s actions.
This was the last book I put up for reading in the Summer Youth Reading Program with Title VII as I left and though I heard some tough things about it from the moms but what was more important to me was hearing was that the students loved it. It was recently the subject of a high school ban in some state. I forget. Strangely enough, there is no sex, swearing or controversial subjects in the story. There is violence, but then again, it was about a war. Maybe they thought Native authors should stick to stories about themselves, the rez or the past…. Which is another reason I love this book, because it is NOT about these things.
SPOILERS: A Song of Fire and Ice: Book One – A Game of Thrones, George RR Martin – I am so enamored of this book. I was told that it was better than the TV series and boy, where they right to tell me that. It gets the reader into the headspace of the characters. I am starting to find myself a bit disappointed in the HBO series now because so many small character moments are lost in the show. Two of my favorite lost moments:
1) When the Bastard Jon Snow first meets Tyrion Lannister known as The Imp, they have their exchange as they do in the show, but lost is the seed of respect that is planted in Snow for Tyrion. “To their fathers, all dwarves are bastards.” And as Tyrion returns to the Stark feast through a doorway hazy with cooking smoke, “When he opened the door, the light from within threw his shadow across the yard, and for just a moment Tyrion Lannister stood as tall as a king.” Cool. And:
2) The phrase Winter is Coming is overplayed in the promotion of the series. So much so that every series based on history or ancient times have began paraphrasing that motto. In the book it means more to the Starks and what this says about Ned Stark’s actions in the book. There is a great scene that is also in the series where Eddard is talking to his daughter Arya about what will happen soon in King’s Landing because the choices he’s made as the Hand and also because he believes her strongest of his two daughters. To illustrate his point he asks her “What are our words?” to which she replies, “Winter is Coming”.
He goes on to explain why that is their house motto. Sure, it sounds like some cool shit to say before you whack someone, but the book really drives it home as a force that Eddard Stark believes in. Throughout much of the book, in his time at King’s Landing, Eddard antagonizes himself and agonizes with the duties of being the Hand of the King. Winter is coming, he explains to Arya is the most deadly time with whole kingdoms being decimated by not only the colds but also by what the long winter brings to the land in creatures and brigands and only those that band together, working out their differences and their quarrels and wars will survive the long winters to see the summers again. This drives all of his actions in the book. He feels duty-bound, at whatever personal cost to himself or his stature to make sure the realm is settled and everyone, while not friends, have settled their stupid business of politics and warring because “winter is coming.” That is lost in the TV series as it is played up for more political intrigue and sex.
By far one of the best series I have started. But nothing comes close to:
Three Kingdoms, attributed to Luo Guanzhong – This will forever be a part of any favorites list for the rest of my life. I enjoy it that much. I read this a scant four times this past year and plan to re-read it again once the chance comes up. Sure, I have had someone tell me that it is about a bunch of privileged men fighting for other privileged men to maintain a hierarchal, obsolete status quo. But that is only because you think you are smarter than the material my freind. I firmly believe that what you take from a book is sometimes more important than author intent. The author’s purpose may have been to give righteousness to Liu Bei’s hegemony. But what comes from this book are great stories of bravery and valor and putting your integrity where your mouth is and fighting for what you believe to be the right thing. A friend of mine is still making these false class divisions in lieu of seeing the need for integrity of every man. That’s is what I get from the book and that has helped me try to be a person of integrity in my own life. So, it remains my All-Time Favorite Book. I will be buried with a copy….

So, now we move from the printed page to motion pictures. Before I get into this year’s list of Best Movies, I like to look at the DVDs I acquired this year, not only new ones released this year but anything I bought as well as a way of revisiting movies from past years and give them a second look or a more thorough review. And, here we go:
Top DVDs of 2012
From the Sky DownThis is the U2 documentary that I wanted to make. It covers the period U2 spent making their masterpiece album Achtung Baby!. Davis Guggenhiem, director of It Might Get Loud (a nice piece on the electric guitar NOT the best guitar players as some idiots believe.), An Inconvenient Truth (the watershed environmental doc which is basically a large Powerpoint presentation) and the dubious Waiting for Superman (his one-sided critique of the US public school system.) traces the background, the fast rise and just-as-fast backlash of U2’ The Joshua Tree success and how it nearly broke up the band and how this struggle lead to their rebranding and cutting one of the greatest rock albums of all time.
Godzilla (Criterion) – I already have a two-disc collection of Gojira by Toho Works that has both the original Japanese and the comically edited US version of the film. But once I heard that Criterion was going to release them with a superior restoration, only one thing came to mind: Special Features. Besides, I am not beyond owning more than one copy of a DVD if it is something I really like. Most fans are aware that the Japanese version is really not a giant monster movie but serves as a metaphor for nuclear weapons and their destruction. But the deeper meanings are always lost on US audiences that deem The Avengers as the greatest movie ever. So as usual, we took a deep metaphor disguised as a monster movie and turned it into a Japanese-movie-through-an-American-lens colloquialism of a guy in a rubber suit smashing tiny buildings for our amusement and our ego of loving such ironic things. Still, Criterion did a great job with this.
Game of Thrones Season One – The HBO series. What more needs to be said. I bought this series, sight-unseen after hearing many great reviews of it. I was not disappointed. Am now eagerly awaiting Season Two on DVD. Yeah, I know. I don’t have cable, satellite for watching TV nor do I like DSL for watching movies online. (If it’s not on TV you cannot call it a TV show.) I don’t even have a digital converter or antennae. It is a greatly produced series with a great cast. This has become one of my Top Five TV Series of All Time.
Supercop (Dragon Dynasty)There are movies out there that you do not know that you want until you see them for sale. I picked up Supercop at Half Price Books apropos of nothing. It was on sale at a reasonable rate. I love Michelle Yeoh (and she is super cute in this) and I have never owned a Jackie Chan movie. I miss Dragon Dynasty. They were putting out some great stuff. This is one of the Police Story series (Police Story 2, I believe) and was repackaged after Rumble in the Bronx hit big in the US. However, this is the US re-edit as the Taiwan version is a bit less fun and more gritty (if such a thing exists). But, that does nothing to take away from the stunt work of Chan and Yeoh. The film was initially released in the US on the heels of their respective successes in Rumble and Crouching Tiger.
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, SpyThis is yet another great Gary Oldman performance who is going so criminally under-noticed by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. I dig this movie a lot. It is a taut spy thriller that captures the feel of the era it is based in. What I hate about movies these days is that when they set movies in the 60’s, 70’s or 80’s is that everyone looks too perfect and beautiful to be from those eras. This casts on talent and that pays off greatly in my opinion. Oldman’s Smiley monolgue about his meeting with Karla remains one of the best onscreen monologues ever. (Actors should use it in their auditions, it’s that good.) Go check this out if you haven’t already, if so, check it out again!
The Dark Knight RisesI have a few ways I measure what I think is a great movie. One is if I am smiling while leaving the theater. The second is if I really am filled with the passion to make movies. The last is how many times I play it over the first day once I get it on DVD. I played Hero, The Dark Knight, Red Cliff, The Tree of Life, Inception and now, The Dark Knight Rises. I just play them over and over and over in my DVD player once I get them home. Movies are great like that…. (SEE BELOW)

All right, now that we have those out of the way. Let’s recap some of the movies I was looking forward to this past year. It is always a good excuse to revisit some that you enjoyed but didn’t think were the best and to critique the films you thought to be pretty bad. So, without further ado:
THE TOP 10 FILMS I WAS LOOKING FORWARD TO FOR 2012 – A RECAP:
1. The Dark Knight Rises dir. Christopher Nolan
SEE BELOW
2. Prometheus dir. Ridley Scott – released June 8, 2012
While I was glad we did not see a Kid Ellen Ripley unleashing the alien xenomorphs through her cute-kid antics, uncovering a super-supreme-ultra-extreme-maxi-secret Corporate Conspiracy that will “redefine how we view the Aliens Movies” and then have a lame CGI climax with millions of xenomorphs and millions of space marines running at each other amidst ‘splosions, I was disappointed that he did indeed make this a f*cking ALIEN PREQUEL! Ridley did the Lucas thing where he just had to over-explain his most iconic villain. The 3D was great, the best I had seen in films up to that point not including documentary films. But, while I enjoyed it, it is not the extreme disappointment many take it for. If Ridley left the Alien connection of the xenomorph and the conspiracy of the aging man out and fixated on the explorations of humanity’s origins and built something scary and fun from that, it would have been a better success. As it is, it carries way too much Alien baggage and that is what drags it down for me.
3. Red Tails dir. Anthony Hemingway – released January 20, 2012
A film about the famed Tuskegee Airmen, the squadron of African-American fighter pilots that went on to rack up the best records during WWII. It was great to see a Lucasfilm slate in front of a non-Star Wars/Indy Jones movie. This was a rather enjoyable war mvoie. It was great to see a simple action film with great heroic story beats. Sure, there was dialogue about racism but it was more in context of their service and delivered as a fact-of-life rather than speechy platitudes. The mostly African-American audience I saw this with were cheering and walked out proud of this part of their history rather than get another Victim Olympics Lip Service.
Many of the non-African American audience were disgusted with its easy story and plotless heroic antics and overly-criticized the CG because it was a George Lucas production and he is evil because how dare he let an African-American director make a heroic film about African Americans! (Because the Tuskegee Airmen were supposed to be martyr symbols of the Oppressed and not Heroes!) Also, how dare George Lucas tell African Americans about their own history while giving an absolute pass to Quentin Tarantino about slavery? (and his film about violence because African Americans are violent and NOT heroic.) Hypocrites.
Apples and oranges I’m sure I’ll be told, different things to be measured differently. Lucas sucks, Tarantino is awesome. But they are both the same in exactly the very feature that should fucking count. They are both MOVIES! We seem to be slipping into this overspecializing of everything where things fail to stand on their own anymore. This movie is great for that type of movie and we elevate mediocrity like it’s something worth achieving. Soon, we will never see great films because we elevate comic book movies, because we want spectacle, to be entertained and our idea of an art film is a violent slave film told to us by a white guy. Come on. We pat ourselves on the back for liking “art films” and ironically liking shitty films. But that gives credence to that huge nugget of film slop projected every day! That is why the Twilights and the Superhero Films will never go away. They make too much money, which is another feature that all these movies share: they are nothing but moneymaking products. We seem to not want to admit that because if we do we all have to admit being duped into paying for “art.”
Anyways. Anthony Hemingway & The Airmen. It was a good film and I enjoyed it. So there.
4. Skyfall dir. Sam Mendez
(SEE BELOW)
5. Gravity, dir. Alfonso Cuaron
(DELAYED – SEE BELOW)
6. The Flowers of War dir. Zhang Yimou
SEE BELOW
7. Coriolanus dir. Ralph Fiennes
SEE BELOW
8. Brave, dir Pete Doctor (Pixar)
SEE BELOW
9. Flying Swords of Dragon Gate 3D, dir Tsui Hark – Limited August 2012 release on IMAX 3D.
This only got a one-week IMAX 3D release in August at a time I was so broke I could not afford to go. I missed out on the craziness of what Tsui Hark could do when purposely shooting on 3D! The DVD is out but I have no interest. I am thinking that 3D may be viable in a broader film-going sense but as the cool tool for telling stories? Nope, not sold. Yet. (See Note Below.)
10. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey dir. Peter Jackson – released December 14, 2012
I have said this before and I still think it sticks: it should have been titled Peter Jackson’s The Well: There and Back Again.
This was pretty much nothing more than a Lord of the Rings rehashing, like the cloying “prrreeeeeciiiiiooouuussss”, as if to say, “Hey Fans, remember The Lord of the Rings? This will be just like it!” What should have been basically a movie for kids and young adults is turned into a “The Lord of the Rings” Prequel! It suffers from what Prometheus and the Star Wars Prequels did, in that it had to explain and set up every single detail of the previous trilogy. At this rate, this will suffer even more for being stretched into a sequel trilogy without the material to fill it. If it does have the material the tone will be too inconsistent to get into. If you recognize a part of this review from my article from last year, you got exactly what I got from The Hobbit: A Expected Journey to the Well.
Oh yeah, it was in 3D too.
A NOTE on HFR & 3D
The first time I saw 3D really work was with U23D, which was a concert film, then again with Wim Wender’s Pina. Which leads me to believe that documentary films would profit much more from being shot for 3D projection. Where it worked for me in a regular feature films were Prometheus, Monsters, Inc., The Legends of the Guardians (which gave me hope for Snyder’s Man of Steel, because the flying scenes in this were spectacular!) and most recently, The Hobbit. 3D for each of these worked showing scope and depth of field, which is what it is supposed to do. So, now I want to shoot a 3D concert film and am planning a couple of documentaries that could be shot in 3D. That would be cool and add immersion and space into the stories. So, for documentaries, 3D would be everything that silly people are saying it was supposed to be and never was for movies like Hugo.
Honestly, I had no problem like I thought I would with the high frame rate projection of The Hobbit. Most movie snobs believe that “real movies” are to be projected at 24 frames per second. The human eye sees at the equivalent of 1000fps or something. (Did I just make that up?) I always through a great story and acting were keys to a great movie, but that’s just me. But the image was crisp and clear and once my eyes adjusted, it was fine. Sure, it took me out of the moments because I could see the phoniness of some of the sets and costumes. It made me think of how little effort was put into some of the costuming and sets. But in the future, I think this high frame rate will be a boon for set directors, builders, make up and costumers as they will all have to raise their game to not make it look fakey due to newer high frame rates! I did get a wicked headache afterwards though.
Plus, once I adjust, the 3D did work better and once the clarity of image and 3D were forgotten about, I could concentrate and see what an utter load of shit The Hobbit was. Here is the rest of the list from last year, a short section I called “The Maybe’s” because I may see them and they may be good. In this case, I was wrong on all counts:
The Maybe’s of 2012:
Marvel’s The Avengers:  This shallow quagmire should have been titled “The Second Halves of Iron Man 2, Thor and First Avenger about a Super Group No One Cared About Until It Tickled Your Comic Geek Egos Starring Robert Downey Jr. Being a Wise Ass to Bland Maskless Superheroes and Then They Save the Day By Pushing the OFF Switch (Oh Yeah, There Will Be A Sequel and Hulk is Finally Cool.)” That’s what it should have been called.
Django Unchained: Django felt cheap to me at the expense of a solid tale. Again, it was filled with underdeveloped characters and side characters that added nothing to the tale. Everyone liked it because it tickled their balls with historical vengeance violence nonsense. Hell, I liked it too a little but it was nothing new from QT who seems to get a pass for it for some reason.
Let’s face it, we like to see cool shit happen because it tickles our ticklies and gives us some vicarious satisfaction without ever hoping that films can aspire to be something greater. Django suffers from the same thing Inglorious Basterds did – shallow storytelling, filled with undeveloped side characters and villain all masked by hype casting and the stealing of tone and ideas from his betters. Cheap because the added baggage of slavery makes anyone that is a slaver character simply evil. Yes, slavery is evil, in a historical sense. In a film sense it is a cheap way of vilifying the bad guy without coming up with great characteristics that gives your villain weight.
Leo’s Calvin Candie is a plantation owner that does nothing in service of the plot. Really. He even sells back Django’s wife. By simply making him a slaver, his evil is evident and that gives the audience license to cheer when he is killed. His evilness is cheaply bought in a filmic sense. What if he was actually someone that was likeable? How would that play against the fact that he is a slaver? Nope, Candie was literally a mustachio-twirling villain for no other reason than the story needed one. All the hype casting was for nothing but little jolts of humor of seeing Tom Wopat, Don Johnson and Jonah Hill say funny shit and then left at the way side, adding nothing to the overall plot.
This was so top-loaded with slavery guilt that only allowed QT to indulge his “motherf*ckers” and “n*ggers” and violence without ever really making anything interesting. I almost could have bought the whole thing until the film embarrasses itself with that little dance shuffle Django makes the horse do as if to say “Yeah, we’ll still dance for you all.” What dreck. I had more to say but I would rather not dwell on this one any longer because it’s a spectacle and that makes it all right.
GI Joe 2: MOVED TO MARCH 2013 but I am fast becoming less and less interested in it.
The Expendables 2:  I finally saw Expendables 2 on DVD recently. Sucked worse than the first. No plot. Just action stars trying to do cool, manly shit. I don’t care who was in it. If you cannot bring something fresh and new to the genre you helped establish then stay home. There is nothing worse than old, great rock bands doing nothing but reunion tours and playing the hits. (Which is why I am glad Zep never reunited.) This was simply playing the hits, and not very well. The greatest cardinal sin, other than shitty dialogue like “His name was BILLY’ as your dramatic punch, is that no one, NO ONE, NO ONE, NO ONE is allowed to have the theme to “The Good, The Bad and the Ugly” played over their introduction into the film but CLINT EASTWOOD AND BOBA FETT!!
This one did not make me sad. It made me laugh at that particular line delivery. But it also made me angry at the waste of talent here. Which makes me question the talent pool to begin with….

So, there you go, my thoughts on films that I was looking forward to this year. I was about 50% on the films I liked in the Upcoming Films of 2012. But, there are many not on the list that I did see and whom others had great opinions about. What did I think of them? Well, here you go:
The Others of 2012
LooperClever casting cannot mask the fact that this was simply a The Terminator rehash when it could have been the most awesome supervillian origin story since Unbreakable.
The Raid: Redemption – Not much raiding and not much redemption. It amazes me at how much manly men love watching sweaty shirtless men beating up on each other. The non-stop screaming and thrashing only reminded me of this.
The Master – Should have been subtitled, “or How to Torture a Drunk for Fun and Profit”. I am sure an eclectic, improv theater troupe will make a play based on this movie with that subtitle. This made me realize that the real reason I loved There Will Be Blood was because of Daniel Day-Lewis. (See Lincoln Below.) Now it seems every “ack-tor” wants that single Plainview performance and overreach for it. This was Joaquin Phoenix’s shot at it and his nonsense distracted me. Phillip Seymour-Hoffman tried to but ended up looking bored through out. I have decided that this has to be, HAS TO BE a PREQUEL to Manos the Hands of Fate. It’s the only way I can reconcile everyone’s love for it.
Crooked Arrows – Okay, get ready to hate me: What should have been a great, fun sports comedy ala The Bad News Bears is so laden down with historical trauma and a director that could not balance the two that is misses it’s one chance to bring Natives into contemporary cinema and shine a larger light on the Iroquois sport of Lacrosse. But now, thanks to underworked films like this, these will never get beyond reservation boundaries.
Once again we fight against evil white corporate interests. When will we tell the tales of Tribal Council corruption and our own intertribal bickering and infighting? Those are ripe for comedy! Dave Spencer had it right, the scene of handing out the magical animal totems made me choke. They had a great set up for it to be a great David versus Goliath tale with the Natives proving their worth on the field as equals. Instead, we get “Hey, you boys needs magic because you are not talented enough in the sport OUR PEOPLE FRICKIN’ INVENTED!!”
Look, there is absolutely nothing wrong at all with being tied to your culture and knowing your people’s language. But knowing your culture always gets confused with the Crutch that is supposed to get us out of things for free in movies. Knowing your culture is fine but the other 90% is hard work. This film does not work for it as either a sports comedy or a cultural identity film. Sorry.
What I found silly:
Cliché of the Wise Old Indian Man
Cliché of the Wise Old FUNNY Indian Woman
Cliché of flashing back to the buckskin and feathers and the yelping and the running, lots of running
Cliché of animal totems
Cliché of “Our People” in every other sentence
Historical Lecturing – no Indian I have ever known talks like that!
Racism against whites – another crutch in films.
The Insult to Native Women when the Indian Hero (Superman no less) falls for the only white woman on the rez
Cliché of young Indian Women are only attracted to the loser Indian Boy
That the white person knows more of the language and has to teach the INDIANS to speak it! Sheesh!
I know a lot of Natives liked this movie. But I think another rewrite of the script and maybe a Native director that says “no” so some of the clichés would have helped it immensely. Native directors need to start putting out more genre works like Crooked Arrows, which was supposed to be a sports comedy. Because when you don’t you are never going to reach a broader audience and begin to break down those barriers. Can you imagine a basketball comedy film by Sherman Alexie? That would be funny! Look, it had everything going for it until it stopped to lecture about every ten minutes.
Send your hate email c/o Dave, AIC….

Well enough of that. So, what did I think were the best films this past year? Okay, here’s what you are waiting for. (I think.):

EW3’s Top Twelve (Ten) a’ Twenty Twelve Movies
Honorable Mentions:
Skyfall – What worried me most was the producers throwing out words like “Connery” and “Goldfinger” when asked about tone and story when for the last two films, they had to do no such thing. I hoped they would not start steering this series back into campy-gadget territory. I did enjoy this overall and I did like the touchstones to the older films, but steering it back to status quo is not the way to go. I’ll have to wait and see if they continue on this track. Great cinematography by the great Roger Deakins and ably directed by Sam Mendes.
Lincoln – No matter what you think of the Lincoln of history, you cannot deny the performance of Daniel Day-Lewis in this film. He carries the whole film on his shoulders, quite ably. But it went on a bit long and suffered from the whole “should have ended earlier” thing. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Lincoln was sucky towards Indians, which is historical truth, but Daniel Day-Lewis as Lincoln? Spectacular! And we all know, spectacle counts more! Tommy Lee Jones was great and has a great character pay-off as well.
12. Citizen Kane
Casablanca
Lawrence of Arabia
I find myself luck enough to live in a city where I can see the classics on the big screen. I can only imagine how I would have been a different person had I access to these back in the small hamlet of Riverton where I grew up. I admit that this #12 is a cheat because I include three films in it. But what films. They still hold up against what ever else was put out this year. It is too bad the current generation cannot stand movies without color or 3D. These were digitally remastered digital projections and they looked great but of course it is the story and characters that continue to enthrall audiences today. They just don’t make them like these anymore. Funny, great story and great performance based on great writing used to count for something at one time.
11. Rifftrax Live: “Manos The Hands of Fate”
Rifftrax Live: “Birdemic: Shock and Terror”
Monsters Inc.
Once again, I cheat to bring you some selections based on theater-going experience that beat out some of the previous films listed. I am a big fan of Mystery Science Theater 3000, you know this and the sequel project Rifftrax have produced some live riffing of some of the worse films ever. In 2012 we got two of the worst, Manos and  Birdemic. For Birdemic we brought along Char and she enjoyed the event though says I scarred her for live with the awfulness that is Birdemic. Monsters, Inc. 3D was another enjoyable romp with Char as we saw this together when it first came out. The 3D was great and it was a joy to see the film again on the big screen and to be able to share that with Bonnie and Char was the added bonus.
10. Safety Not Guaranteed – Directed by Colin Trevorrow: A small independent film about a news blogger answering an ad for a time travel partner. It was dark and mysterious and the lead actress Aubrey Plaza didn’t bother me too much because she did not play the same character she always does. What made the movie for me was the intimacy of the characters’ relationships. We have the blogger connecting with someone everyone thinks is crazy. We have her boss trying to reconnect with a lost, high school love and a nerdy guy trying to connect at all. What surprised me most, after seeing the trailer and the promotions for this and even seeing the movie, was that it is billed as a comedy! Sure, there were funny moments, like the time traveler’s breaking into a research facility for parts but it never came off as a comedy. Still, it was touching, especially seeing her boss, in what would have typically been played as a privileged white douche in other films, struggling with his feelings for his old love. Great little film.
9. Take This Waltz, written and directed by Sarah Polley: Another independent film. I am falling more in lust with Michelle Williams, after My Week with Marilyn and now this, a small drama about life not living up to your expectations and the temptation to move on to someone else. Sarah Silverman turns up in a great role as the smartest person in the film, a recovering alcohol who sees the same type need in the Michelle Williams’ character, as she is tempted to start a relationship with a neighbor. Instead of alcohol, it is lust. It was great to see Silverman in a non-snarky, non-vulgarity role. Seth Rogan is in this as well and he surprises bringing a warmth and humanity to the role of Michelle Williams’ husband. A great film about the desire to give into your lust and its consequences.
8. The Impossible – Directed by Juan Antonio Bayona: The true story of a Spanish family (here, played as Brits) that survived the tsunami that devastated Thailand. A solid escape tale with harrowing scenes of flooding and destruction. What truly anchors the film is the performance of the child actors. It becomes a taut thriller as the disparate members of the family trying mightily to find one another again. The only thing that bugged me was before the end credits they show a picture of the family and you realized that they whitewashed the family. It was a great story and expertly shot film but that stuck in my craw. Still, a better film than most of what was out there.
7. Argo, directed by Ben Affleck: This is a solid thriller about the unseen Iranian hostage crisis story of the government of Canada helping the US extricate embassy staff using a phony film as a cover. Affleck continues his string of solid films as a director and I hope he never does a superhero or Star Wars film, ever. He’s too talented a director to be squandered on the likes of such commercial pap. As with The Impossible seeing a picture of the real agent that Affleck plays, you realize that Esai Morales or Michael Pena would have been closer to the real guy because Affleck did great in matching actors to the actual person they were portraying. Stuck in the craw again, but another great flick out there.
6. The Flowers of War – Directed by Zhang Yimou: Now, I did not see this in the theater. It only played a short time when I was severely broke. But catching it on DVD did not diminish the impact of the story. Zhang Yimou tackles a tale from the Rape of Nanking where an American mortician must pretend to be a priest to protect a cadre of Chinese schoolgirls left behind in the maelstrom of the Japanese invasion. Add to this mixture, a class of high-end Chinese prostitutes that push their way into the school and hide there as well. Then, as always with a Yimou film, the difficult choices reached in the emotional climax of the film must be seen. I do not want to ruin it for anyone. It has action, with a Chinese soldier lingering around the school protecting the girls from Japanese soldiers, it has light comedic moments and it shows the horror visited upon the women but its depths are the emotional attachments made between the girls and the women, with the Mortician and one of the Prostitutes, and it all wraps up in the emotional ending of the film. I highly recommend this one.
5. Brave – Produced by Pixar, Directed by Marc Andrews and Brenda Chapman: What I loved most about this latest offering from Pixar, besides the clear throughline of the story was that it was a tale about a mother and a daughter and the bonding they go through as they work to solve their many predicaments. Lovely animation as always, funny and caring. Check it out.
4. Coriolanus – Directed by Ralph Fiennes, based on the play by William Shakespeare – When I first saw the trailer for this, I could not wait. I scraped up my change and saw it twice. This is the directorial debut of Ralph Fiennes and he plays Coriolanus with a savage privilege and makes the battle scenes intense and his couching it into modern times fits. I know there are the purists who prefer Shakespeare be kept to Elizabethan structures, but we would miss out on such powerhouses as Baz Luhmanns’ Romeo + Juliet and the performance of John Leguizamo as Tybalt, Brangh’s Muc Ado about Nothing as well as solid adaptations that color and flavor the stories with cultural spices. Here, Fiennes adds another great adaptation to the list. If this is his first work, imagine what he can accomplish as a director. All the actors bring their A-game. But who shines is Brian Cox not playing someone slimy. Plus, he gets a good performance from Gerard Bulter! It also highlights the fickle nature of crowd politics. A great movie.
1. TIE: The Dark Knight Rises – Directed by Christopher Nolan
On the Ice – Directed by Andrew Okpeaha MacLean
Beasts of the Southern Wild – Directed by Benh Zeitlin
You can see my thoughts on The Dark Knight Rises by CLICKING HERE. Nolan crafted another great film to close the Dark Knight Trilogy. Sure, some where let down but I was enthralled by the emotion of the story and closure it lent, which is something no one tries for anymore.
I saw On the Ice way back in January and I was hard pressed to find a better film all year. Nothing came close to the intimacy of the story and the environment. It was expertly directed and the performances of the two leads shine in a story about the mystery of a missing youth in the far north where there are limited places to hide both in the landscape and in one’s heart. As I said, I was hard pressed to find a better film, but one came even.
Beasts of the Southern Wild is told through the lens of the lead character, a small girl named Hushpuppy. She struggles with the flooded area called the Bath Tub with her father Wink. They are engrained in the community of people as they struggle with melting ice caps and monsters from the past. The lead actress Quvenzhané Wallis is a wonder and the cinematography is a wonder. The magic of the film had me in tears hoping it worked to save one of the characters. A great movie. Both are great. All three are great....

 Well, that's it for 2012. Now, we will look ahead to this year. I know, it seems that everyone is doing an "Anticipated Films" list these day. But what can I say. I like comparing the lists the next year. Besides, it's the final list of this post so stop bellyaching:
Top Ten Films I am Looking Forward to in 2013
1. Man of Steel, dir. Zack Snyder – After seeing Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’hoole I was a bit reassured that Zack Snyder could handle a mythology and flying. The trailers look great. I cannot believe people are dismissing this because he isn’t wearing red underwear over his suit. TRAILER
2. Gravity, dir. Alfonso Cuaron I have been ever impressed with Mexican filmmaker Cuaron. He made me a fan of the Harry Potter series, his Y Tu Mama Tambian made me feel I can still make it as an “ethnic” moviemaker and his Children of Men is an unsung masterpiece. This time he is trying longer takes in telling the story of two astronauts trying to survive a satellite crashing into their space station. George Clooney and Sandra Bullock star. TRAILER N/A.
3. Pacific Rim, dir. Guillermo Del Toro – A movie about a world that builds giant robots to fight kaiju? What is not to love? TRAILER
4. Unforgiven, (Yurusarezaru mono) dir. Lee Sang-Il – We have come full circle when a Clint Eastwood western inspires a samurai film. Looking forward to seeing this get a US release without the Weinsteins getting their re-editing hands on it. TRAILER
5. Stand Up Guys, dir Fischer Stevens – It is good to see Walken and Pacino try acting again for a change. Looks fun and warm. TRAILER
6. The Grandmaster, dir. Wong Kar-Wai – Another, more stylized version of the Ip Man story with a great as always Tony Leung playing the lead in a cool ass fedora! TRAILER
7. Star Trek Into Darkness dir. J.J. Abrhams – I dunno. This looks like it could be fun but everyone is expecting it to be about Khan from the old series. Hardcore Trekkies hate the Abrams-verse. I don’t care. Looks like fun. TRAILER
8. Much Ado About Nothing dir Joss Whedon – I like Shakespeare adaptations and am happy to see Whedon stretch his wings. I only hope his fanbase allows him to. I have not heard a lot of fans clamoring for this one. They want more Avengers or a Whedon Star Wars, forget some of the greatest literary plays of all time, we want spectacle! TRAILER N/A
9. To the Wonder dir Terrence Malick – Another Dunno. I was fully onboard the Malick Train after the fantastic Tree of Life and followed him to The Thin Red Line which I love more than Private Ryan. But the only thing catching my eye about this is the character played by Javier Bardem. Was “meh” about The New World and have yet to see  Badlands or  Days of Heaven both of which will be available by Criterion. TRAILER
10. Journey to the West dir Stephen Chow – Another adaptation of one of China’s Five Great Literary Classics, this one has Donnie Yen playing the Monkey King. We’ll see. TRAILER
The Maybe’s of 2013:
The Assassins – Zhao Linshan, finally, Chow Yun-fat plays Cao Cao as a pair of assassins plot his death, until one of them realizes he is not the insidious evil he was made out to be. I hope a US release. TRAILER
Evil Dead – The remake no one wanted. Still the trailer makes it stand above other remakes which are simple rehashes, going over old ground. TRAILER
World War Z – This has changed so much from its literary origins that I think some folks would like it better if it were called something else. I love the book which is the only zombie thing I cared for in a while Zombies are the most useless of horror creatures. TRAILER
Monsters U. – This is yet another sequel/prequel from Pixar which have had various degrees of success. It is about the college years of Mike and Sully. In the Monsters Inc 3D version, there was an added stinger of Mike and Sully putting on the musical they used as a cover for their weird behavior and introduced the character of Mike’s mother, whom I assume plays a part in this movie. TRAILER
Despicable Me 2 – I loved the first one and I hope that this concentrates on his raising his little girls to be supervillians because that would be cool and original. But from the teaser, it centers on the Minions, the least annoying cute thing since the mowgli. TRAILER
The Wolverine – This is the the SIXTH film to feature this character, this time transporting him to Japan to learn ninjistu (sound familiar? It should, it was the best series Frank Miller put out in the run of the Wolverine comics.). With an aging Hugh Jackman, we’ll see if the immortal Wolverine still shreds. TRAILER N/A
What about all the Marvel Sequels such as Iron Man 3 and Thor 2? Well, maybe since the The Avengers pressure is off maybe they can have complete films with a beginning, middle and end this time, you know? But, I was recently MAJORLY spoiled with IM3 and now, I find it less interesting....

Thanks for sticking with it this far. I know some pretty expected selections, but hey, maybe I threw a curve at you here and there. Let me know what you think. I’ll see you here next year.

Until Next Time…
2013 Ernest M. Whiteman III